Many of my friends who live outside of the United States simply can’t understand why it is so hard for our government to come up with a plan to provide quality health care for all of its citizens. They ask why there is so much resistance to something that would certainly benefit all Americans, I have tell them it’s because we don’t really want it.

It’s easy to lay the blame for the lack of progress on providing universal health care at the feet of greedy insurance companies; a poor economy; bad-timing, whacked out neocons; racists who just want the first Black President to fail; or a combination of all of the above. But in my opinion, health care reform, or the lack thereof, comes down to the simple fact that it is not yet a priority for most Americans.

It’s very popular to quote Abraham Lincoln these days so I’ll share this one: “Determine that a thing can and shall be done, and then we shall find the way.”

Or as Tim McGraw might say, “How Bad Do You Want It?”

As a nation we have yet to determine that quality health care for all shall be done. We want it, but not that bad. After all, most Americans have some form of coverage, don’t they? We certainly can’t cut the budgets for defense spending, space exploration, farm subsidies and building new prisons. Lord knows that no one wants to stop building new sports stadiums. Do we? And please don’t mention the money spent on political campaigns and lobbying.

So the debate on health care reform gets clouded with misinformation, lies, racist comments, half-hearted efforts and fear-mongering, all in order to hide the ugly truth. We, as a nation, lack the will to make it happen.

Insurance corporations don’t want to give up profits. Executives don’t want to give up bonuses. Stock holders don’t want to give up dividends. Politicians don’t want to lose votes or campaign dollars. Bureaucrats don’t want their budgets slashed. And NO ONE wants to pay more taxes.

Of course, I’m sure that Congress will eventually pass some form of health care reform in order to allow us all to pretend that America has taken one small step in the right direction. But to use a football analogy, driving 80 yards down the field means very little if you falter in the red zone and have to settle for a field goal.

I don’t have much confidence that Washington.will pass real health care reform I hope that they will prove me wrong. I’ll be happy to eat a little crow. For now I don’t think that they know how to sell it and I don’t think that they’re willing to take the political risk to try. .And I’m not alone.

In her article, “Health Care Reform Needs An Action Hero“, Amy Goodman writes:

“Imagine the scene. America 2009. Eighteen thousand people have died in one year, an average of almost 50 a day. Who’s taking them out? What’s killing them?

To investigate, President Barack Obama might be tempted to call on Jack Bauer, the fictional rogue intelligence agent from the hit TV series “24,” who invariably employs torture and a host of other illegal tactics to help the president fight terrorism. But terrorism is not the culprit here:

It’s lack of adequate health care. So maybe the president’s solution isn’t Jack Bauer, but rather the actor who plays him.

The star of “24” is played by Kiefer Sutherland, whose family has very deep connections to health care reform—in Canada. Sutherland is the grandson of the late Tommy Douglas, the pioneering Canadian politician who is credited with creating the modern Canadian health care system.”

.
Noted columnist Eugene Robinson points out that you don’t have to be a “nut job” to have serious questions about the proposed health care bill. In his article, “A Reason for all the Health Care Rage“, he writes:

“We know that there are crazies in the town hall mobs—paranoid fantasists who imagine they hear the whop-whop-whop of the World Government black helicopters coming closer by the minute. We know that much of the action is being directed from the wings by cynical political operatives, following a script written by Washington lobbyists. But the nut jobs and carpetbaggers are outnumbered by confused and concerned Americans who seem genuinely convinced they’re not being told the whole truth about health care reform.

And they have a point.”

In the following video clip, respected professor George Lakoff points out what a pitiful job the Democrats are doing at trying to frame the health care reform debate.

And finally, Paul Krugman explains that many progressives are just as upset with the current health care debate as conservatives. In his op-ed, “Obama’s Trust Problem“, Krugman writes:

“On the issue of health care itself, the inspiring figure progressives thought they had elected comes across, far too often, as a dry technocrat who talks of “bending the curve” but has only recently begun to make the moral case for reform. Mr. Obama’s explanations of his plan have gotten clearer, but he still seems unable to settle on a simple, pithy formula; his speeches and op-eds still read as if they were written by a committee.

Meanwhile, on such fraught questions as torture and indefinite detention, the president has dismayed progressives with his reluctance to challenge or change Bush administration policy.

And then there’s the matter of the banks.

I don’t know if administration officials realize just how much damage they’ve done themselves with their kid-gloves treatment of the financial industry, just how badly the spectacle of government supported institutions paying giant bonuses is playing. But I’ve had many conversations with people who voted for Mr. Obama, yet dismiss the stimulus as a total waste of money. When I press them, it turns out that they’re really angry about the bailouts rather than the stimulus — but that’s a distinction lost on most voters.

So there’s a growing sense among progressives that they have, as my colleague Frank Rich suggests, been punked. And that’s why the mixed signals on the public option created such an uproar.”

So if you’re not a “nut job”, a racist, an obstructionist, or a GOP operative and you still have questions about the proposed health care reform, you’re in good company.

crossposted on Pam’s Coffee Conversation

a blog post that was started on 5/6/09

Sorry, this is not going to be one of those glamorous public confessions about drug addiction. I just knew that the post title would grab attention. People just love a public fall from grace, don’t they?

Rather this is a post about why I’ve turned off, or rather tuned out, C-SPAN and much of corporate owned media news for much of the past month.

I guess there comes a time in every junkie’s life, even a political junkie, when you realize that it’s time to kick the habit. When the high you once experienced just isn’t there anymore.

When I decided that it wasn’t worth destroying my lungs in order to avoid gaining twenty pounds, I quit cold turkey and haven’t looked back. My epiphany came when I lit a cigarette and almost became ill at the smell of smoke on my suede gloves.

Now it seems that I am well on the way to kicking the political habit. This time there’s been no startling illumination, just the slow realization that the battle of ideology that so fascinated me as a child isn’t really about ideology at all. Politics is about power, acquiring it, holding on to it and brokering it.

I’ve never been so naive that I believed that politics was pure ideology. While my political heroes might include Barbara Jordan, Robert Kennedy and Ann Richards I’m also a big fan of Lyndon B Johnson, whom I consider to have been a master politician.

I’ve always understood that politics is a game of give and take, give a little to get a little, compromise on the small issues to win on the big ones. It takes money and lots of favors to win an election and even more money and more favors to get re-elected. It’s almost a miracle that any real and meaningful ever occurs.

However after following the news of the bank bailout, the collapse of the US automotive industry, the plans for troop escalation in Afghanistan, the unwillingness to investigate the questionable deeds of the previous administration and, the telling of one fable after another from Congress, I’m beginning to feel that the more things “change” the more they really stay the same.

Watching politics is starting to feel like watching a new football season. A few players retired, a few were traded, the rules committee made a few changes to the rule book, but it’s still the same game, And that’s the problem, the political game. And while part of me loves watching the theater of the politicians, the power brokers and the media, a larger part of me is weary of the BS. The whole thing is starting to smell like stale cigarettes.

I’m tired of watching a political stage play that has: US military personnel serving 3 and 4 back-to-back tours of duty; bank CEOs profiting from bailouts after they’ve already fleeced the public: Wall Street execs whining over bonuses while veterans sleep under bridges; and, admissions that the US officials condoned torture that are met by a general malaise and an unwillingness to investigate the practices of torture, extraordinary rendition, illegal wiretapping, war profiteering and other possible violations of the US Constitution.

Don’t misunderstand me. I never expected overnight change in Washington. I did expect at least a 90, if not 180, degree course correction. Is that asking too much?

While this year started out with hope as well as pomp and circumstance, it didn’t take long for it to become clear who wrote the biggest campaign checks. Congress writes a stimulus/recovery bill that virtually everyone hates, Wall Street and the banking industry gets a bailout and a tap of the wrist, there is a troop escalation in Afghanistan, auto workers get the shaft, the health-care industry promises to play nice this time and the American public is told it’s time to move on and that nothing will be gained by investigating the misdeeds of the previous 8 years. In other words, back to business as usual.

The same applies to much of the political blogosphere. Lots of rehashing the same ole same ole and mainstream media talking points. Of course there has been no shortage of discussion about executive bonuses, Prop 8 and the Sotomayer nomination. These are certainly important issues and worthy of serious discussion. But when these hot button stories devolve into nothing more than more divisive rhetoric they only shift the focus away from the ongoing wars in Iraq & Afghanistan, the practices of torture and extraordinary rendition, the fate of the millions impacted by the failure of the auto industry and the overt corruption of the oil and banking industries.

Maybe I’m jaded or may I just hoped for real change.

However, when I hear reports like the one by Jeremy Scahill’s of the Obama administration’s continued use of a unit known as the Immediate Reaction Force (aka Extreme Repression Force) which regularly gang beats Guantanamo detainees, you have to understand that I just can’t get overly excited about a Supreme Court nominee, even if it is a woman of Puerto Rican heritage.

As Naomi Wolf pointed out in her article “Busted, Pentagon: Why the Photos Probably Do Show Detainees Sodomized and Raped“: “The Telegraph of London broke the news - because the US press is in a drugged stupor.”

Commenting on the decision to suppress these photos and the minimal level of public outcry, Ms Wolf writes:

“Is systemic sex crime practiced by the US in a consequence of the lawlessness of `the war on terror’ surprising to those of us who work on issues of sexual abuse and war? It is totally predictable: when you give soldiers anywhere in the world the power, let alone the mandate, to hold women or men helpless, without recourse to law, kidnap them as a matter of policy - as US military kidnapped the wives of `insurgents’ in order to compel them to turn themselves in - strip them naked, and threaten them, you have a completely predictable recipe for mass sexual assault. The magisterial study of rape in war, Susan Brownmiller’s Men, Women and Rape, proves that.

But what is far scarier about these images Obama refuses to release and that the Pentagon is likely to be lying about now is that it is not the evidence of lower-level soldiers being corrupted by power - it is proof of the fact that the most senior leadership - Bush, Rumsfeld and Cheney, with Rice’s collusion - were running a global sex crime trafficking ring with Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib and Baghram as the holding sites. The sexual nature of the torture also gives the lie to Cheney’s and others’ defense of torture as somehow functional: the sexual perversity mandated from the top reveals that it was just plain old sick sadism gratified by a very sick form of pleasure. I also pointed out in `Sex Crimes in the White House’ that the escalation of the sexual abuse showed the same classic pattern shown by sex criminals everywhere - you start with stripping the victim, keeping him or her completely in your power, and then you engage in greater and more violent excesses with more and more self-justification.”

Ms. Wolf continues:

“And women especially, who understand how sexual abuse and rape can break the spirit in a uniquely anguishing way, should be raising their voices loudly.

Whom are we protecting by not releasing the photos? The victims? Hardly. It’s, as feminists have been saying for decades, not their shame. The perpetrators? Their crimes are archived; if not this administration, another may well obey the law release the images, which are evidentiary. (Again: that rape and sodomy were directed from the top; prosecute those at the top.)

These photos go to exactly why Obama is burning what is left of the shreds of the Constitution by calling for preemptive detention for about 100 detainees. It ain’t because they are `too dangerous,’ his pathetic justification. It is because their bodies are crime scenes. It is because the torture, including possibly the sexual assault, they experienced is likely to be so horrific that if they were ever to have their day in court it is others whom Obama needs who would be incriminated.” .

Yes, why aren’t women everyone screaming their outrage at the top of their lungs?

Why isn’t every Christian crying out that this is NOT loving and caring for your brother. Torture is not turning the other cheek or forgiving those who trespass against us. As a follower of the teachings of Jesus Christ I do not understand those who profess Christianity and believe that Jesus would advocate returning evil for evil or would remain silent when others do.

May I be so bold to suggest that the Jesus of my faith would probably march into Guantanamo and set the captives free against the passionate protestations of Dick Cheneys, Sarah Palins and Michelle Bachmanns. So forgive me if I’ve just stopped listening to that cast of characters.

I’m also starting to tune out atheist progressives who think that it is so cool to stereotype all Christians, blame all the evils of the world on religion and then claim to be such great admirers of Martin Luther King and Gandhi.

Of course I am as a thirsty for knowledge and passionate about the issues as ever. But I’ve grown weary of politicians performing for C-SPAN’s cameras and cable news programs with promos that sound like that were written by a boxing promoter.

As I mentioned in a recent post, Albert Einstein is quoted as saying: “The world is a dangerous place, not because of those who do evil, but because of those who look on and do nothing.”

Ah, enough of my ramblings for now. I’ll keep you posted on my recovery.

originally posted on Pam’s Coffee Conversation

Of course, I would never compare former Pres. George W. Bush to Nobel Peace Prize Winner former Pres. Jimmy Carter. The latter understood diplomacy. But you get the point.

The hypocrisy is obvious.

Yesterday, I took part in a great discussion on the current economic crisis with Alan Silberberg, CEO of You2Gov and Tami Winfrey Harris of the blog “What Tami Said” and host of the “The Best of What Tami Said”. a blogtalk radio program. During our discussion we clearly explained that many economy watchers saw this crisis coming as early as 2005. You can listen to our discussion by going to The Best of What Tami Said for Sunday, March 22

So where were the cries for Tea Parties then?

I’ll let you be the judge.